The Sky Is Falling!


You’ve seen the fear tactics on the news and floating around the facebook world. Every year it seems we’re told, “The most recent outbreak of measles or pertussis is the biggest since…” Then follows the same old claims, “Outbreaks are occurring because of the unvaccinated!”, “The only reason you have the privilege of not vaccinating is because everyone else does!”, “Science has proven that vaccines are safe and effective, you must be anti-science!” We’ve been programmed into thinking that we need “herd” immunity.

I am not an “anti-vaxxer,” nor am I “anti-science.” I am, however, against flawed science, lies, and misinformation.

“Herd immunity,” we’re told, requires 80-95% (depending on the disease) of the population be vaccinated to protect babies and the immune compromised who cannot be vaccinated. If we do not keep vaccination levels high, deadly diseases will come back.

This herd immunity theory originally came about in 1933 by a researcher named A W Hedrich. He discovered that when 68% of a given population developed natural immunity to measles, epidemics disappeared from that given community.(1) Unfortunately, when it comes to vaccine-induced herd immunity, the science is flawed. You see, naturally acquired immunity lasts a lifetime, however, vaccine-induced immunity does not, hence all the added boosters over the years.

According to Dr. Russell Blaylock, neurosurgeon, “That vaccine-induced herd immunity is mostly myth can be proven quite simply. When I was in medical school, we were taught that all of the childhood vaccines lasted a lifetime. This thinking existed for over 70 years. It was not until recently that it was discovered that most of these vaccines lost their effectiveness 2 to 10 years after being given. What this means is that at least half the population, (the baby boomers) have had no vaccine-induced immunity against any of these diseases for which they had been vaccinated very early in life. In essence, at least 50% or more of the population has been unprotected for decades.”

“If we listen to present day wisdom, we are all at risk of resurgent massive epidemics should the vaccinations rates fall below 95%. Yet, we have all lived for at least 30 to 40 years with 50% or less of the population having vaccine protection.”

Are we really that naive to believe that these “outbreaks” are because of the small percentage of unvaccinated children? Let’s ignore the evidence from medical journals clearly documenting that measles and pertussis outbreaks are found in highly vaccinated populations. Here are a few examples:

In 1984, a measles outbreak in an Illinois high school found 100% of students had been vaccinated.(2)

In 1985, a measles outbreak in Texas was documented with 99% vaccinated and 1% unvaccinated.(3)

In 1986, 90% of 1300 pertussis cases in a Kansas outbreak were in appropriately vaccinated persons.
-Neil Miller, Vaccines: Are They Really Safe and Effective? Fifth Printing, 1994, p. 33.

In 1988, a measles outbreak in a college in Colorado found 98% of students had documentation of adequate measles immunity.(4)

In 2010, the largest outbreak of pertussis (reportedly) in over 50 years occurred in California. 81 percent of these cases occurred in people who were FULLY vaccinated.(5)

In 2012, a pertussis outbreak in Vermont found 90% of children had been vaccinated.(6)

But we’re still being told vaccines are effective and the public is still believing it.

I saw the latest propaganda piece floating around today. It’s titled, “The toll of the anti-vaccination movement, in one devastating graphic.” It goes on to show a graph of measles and pertussis outbreaks worldwide from 2008-2014. The most disturbing part of the article read, “The lesson of all this is that vaccination is not an individual choice to be made by a parent for his or her own offspring. It’s a public health issue, because the diseases contracted by unvaccinated children are a threat to the community.” This is complete and utter ignorance. Interestingly, the article failed to provide details about these so-called “outbreaks.” First of all, define “outbreak.” How many persons were vaccinated/unvaccinated? How many resulted in death? I’d like to see a graph showing those affected by vaccine injuries in the past 6 years! Talk about devastating.

Let’s take a step back here and actually do some research.

I’ll start with measles. Are you aware that mortality rates dropped before the measles vaccination program even began?

1920- 469,924 cases reported, 7,515 patients died (1.6%)
1955- Measles death rate <0.03/100,000 (less than 3 in 10,000,000)
1963 – Measles Vaccination Program begins

Dr. Alexander Langmuir, MD, who created the epidemiology section of what is now known as the CDC stated, “To those who ask me, ‘Why do you wish to eradicate measles?, ‘I reply with the same answer that Hillary used when asked why he wished to climb Mt. Everest. He said, ‘Because it is there.’ To this may be added, “..and it can be done.” He was well aware that mortality rates had already declined when he described measles as a “…self-limiting infection of short duration, moderate severity, and low fatality…”(7)

Does measles pose a risk? Sure, it does. More so in developing countries who lack adequate nutrition and care. In healthy, well-nourished children, measles has low mortality rates and no complications. Vitamin A actually reduces morbidity in all children. Why must we be scared into thinking vaccination is the only protection? Why not more educating on increasing the level of health in our children and learning how to care for them if they do contract a disease such as this?

Have you ever visited the VAERS website? If not, you should. We're told by our doctors and scientists that vaccines are safe. VAERS tells a different story. In 2011, 2,585 adverse reactions were submitted as a result of the MMR vaccine, 271 of them serious. Serious meaning "Life-Threatening, Hospitalized, Disabled, and/or Died.” In 2012, 2,529 adverse reactions were submitted, 264 of them serious. I looked back further in the early 2000s and found even higher reports. It is estimated that only between 1 and 10% of the total number of reactions are actually reported each year. So these numbers are potentially higher. And they really want vaccine decisions taken from the parent and left to the government? THAT is outrageous!

Let’s take a look at pertussis.

Pertussis is most dangerous in younger babies and that is certainly reason to be concerned. However, as usual, many doctors resort to scare tactics when it comes to this disease instead of knowledgeable advice. Have you noticed that anytime the media brings up the issue, they show a video of a young baby on his or her back during a coughing spell? Is it not common sense that leaving babies with pertussis on their backs is irresponsible and dangerous? I mean, really! There is successful treatment for whooping cough, but don’t expect the medical establishment to fill you in on it as it does not provide big Pharma any financial gain. Interesting to note, babies under 1 year rarely got pertussis before the vaccine came into play. This is because prior to vaccination, babies were protected by their mother’s placenta and breast milk. This is most likely not the case anymore as mothers are vaccinated and therefore unable to pass these antibodies to their babies.

So, vaccination for pertussis is pushed and pushed, without mention of the failures associated with it. According to Tom Skinner, a spokesman for the CDC, “The vaccination isn’t 100 percent effective. So there are some cases where a person may get whooping cough even though they have been vaccinated.”(8) Oh, but it’s because YOU didn’t vaccinate YOUR child. Right.

“The vaccine is not going to eradicate pertussis,” said Dr. Peter Cieslak, Medical Director of the Oregon Immunization Program. “It isn’t good enough to wipe out the disease, and it’s going to be around indefinitely.” Did you read that? Ok, then in the same breath he says, “So the message we want to get out is to do what you can to protect yourself and get vaccinated because we’re going to continue to be exposed to it in the future.”(9) What? So, the vaccine is a failure, but you need to get vaccinated? Am I missing something?

Let’s once again ignore the evidence which clearly shows pertussis centers in vaccinated communities.

For example, in 2010, a spike in whooping cough cases appeared at Kaiser Permanente in San Rafael. Dr. David Witt, an infectious disease specialist at Kaiser Permanente Medical Center in San Rafael, California stated, “GSK (GlaxoSmithKline) has never studied the duration of the vaccine’s protection after the shot given to four to six-year olds. We have a real belief that the durability (of the vaccine) is not what was imagined…We started dissecting data. What was very surprising was the majority of cases were in FULLY vaccinated children. That’s what started catching our attention.”(10)

More recently, it has been reported that the acellular pertussis vaccination is enhancing B. parapertussis colonization. The DTaP vaccine given five times to children under age 6 and booster doses for teenagers and adults does NOT protect against whooping cough caused by B. parapertussis. Just last year, vaccine-resistant pertussis strains were found in Philadelphia. According to Dr. Jennifer Vodzak, an infectious disease specialist at St. Christopher’s Hospital for Children, Philadelphia, “Of 30 samples analyzed, 18 (60%) showed a variant that conferred resistance to the current vaccine formulation.”(11)

Furthermore, according to VAERS, the danger of severe reactions and deaths from the DTaP vaccine far outweigh the danger of pertussis itself. For instance, from 2004-2008, 111 deaths from pertussis were reported to the CDC. In the same years, over 2500 serious reactions were reported to VAERS in association with the DTaP vaccine, 229 of them were deaths. Certainly puts things into perspective a bit!

As of May 2013, the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP) has paid out 2.7 billion for cases involving injuries among all vaccines with the DTaP causing more disability, illness and highest risks, even exceeding MMR. Take a look here and you’ll find the balance in the Vaccine Injury Compensation Trust Fund is nearly $3.5 billion.

Why are we not given this information from our doctors and public health authorities? According to Shawn Siegel, “Obviously, if vaccines can kill and cause serious and debilitating lifelong damage – which they can and do – the vaccine administrator must provide that information to the client, in unambiguous fashion, regardless of the estimated size of the risk. It’s an ethical mandate that must be fulfilled, but it never is…Conscious denial of critical information is disinformation.”(12)

I encourage everyone to dig in and research for yourself. Don’t just simply believe the latest article being passed around meant to scare people. Dig deeper. Question things. Read. Think. Weigh the risks and the benefits. Then make an educated decision.


Generations of Lies


If it were not for vaccinations, we would still be plagued by the horrors of smallpox and the iron lungs of polio. Well, at least this is what I used to believe. My intention is not to downplay the suffering people have gone through dealing with such diseases, however, the lies passed down for decades is unacceptable. That is what I am addressing in this post.

Statistics show that smallpox deaths actually increased after the introduction of the vaccine. Jennifer Craig, BSN, MA, PH.D, wrote an eye-opening article regarding the origins of smallpox. She quotes William Tebb, who wrote in 1884, “Vaccination (in England) was made compulsory by an Act of Parliament in the year 1853; again in 1867, and still more stringent in 1871. Since 1853, we have had three epidemics of smallpox, each being more severe than the one preceding.” Deaths from smallpox in the first ten years (1854-1863) after compulsory vaccination totaled 33,515. In the second 10 years (1864-1873), deaths totaled 70,458. Dr. William Farr, Compiler of Statistics of The Registrar General of London and considered to be the first developer of vital statistics, stated: “Smallpox attained its maximum mortality after vaccination was introduced.” After the compulsory vaccination law was repealed in 1907, deaths from smallpox went down. Craig writes, “According to official figures of the Registrar General of England, 109 children under five years in England and Wales died of smallpox between 1910-1933. In that same period 270 died from vaccination. Between 1934-1961 not one smallpox death was recorded but 115 children under five years died from smallpox vaccination.” (1)

From 1886-1892, in Japan, the case mortality from smallpox was nearly 25 percent, despite a law requiring re-vaccination every 7 years. So what did they do? What they still do today. More boosters! Another act was passed by the government to require every resident be vaccinated and re-vaccinated every 5 years! What happened? The case mortality rate went up to 30 percent. Did I mention that the case mortality rate prior to vaccination was about 10 percent? (2)

Are you reading this?!

The worst epidemic known to the Philippines occurred in 1918-1919, even with over 95% of the population vaccinated. William Howard Hay, MD, in the congressional Record of December 21, 1937, stated, “The Philippines suffered the worst attack of smallpox, the worst epidemic three times over, that had ever occurred in the history of the islands and it was almost three times as fatal. The death rate ran a high as 60% in certain areas where formerly it had been 10-15%.” (3)

Well, then what is the explanation for smallpox eradication?

J.T. Biggs explains in his book, “Leicester: Sanitation versus Vaccination,” how the city of Leicester in England stopped vaccination (1880-1908) and instead “signalized the “Leicester Method” of sanitation and isolation in coping with small-pox.” As a result, smallpox death rates plummeted. Biggs writes, “Leicester has become the healthiest of the principal manufacturing centres, thanks to well-considered, efficient, and properly executed sanitary measure, combined with the virtual cessation of vaccination.” Perhaps improved sanitation and better living conditions contributed to the disappearance of smallpox.

Now let’s take a look at “eradication” of polio.

I always thought that any case of polio resulted in paralysis. After researching, I found that 95% of cases are asymptomatic, meaning no symptoms are even produced. It is only in 0.1%-2% of cases that result in paralytic polio. 50% of paralytic polio cases have complete recovery. (4)

Polio vaccine distribution started in 1955. After this, polio cases went down dramatically. Interestingly, the CDC fails to mention that the definition and diagnosis changed the same year. A blood sample was needed for diagnosis and long lasting paralysis (residual paralysis at 10-20 days and again at 50-70 days after onset of illness). Prior, any case of paralysis was considered polio (partial or complete paralysis of one or more muscle groups and paralysis detected on two exams, 24 hours apart). Also, the definition of an epidemic changed in 1955. (Prior to 1954: 6/100,000 After 1954: 35/100,000) Even without vaccination, many cases of polio would have been eliminated simply from these radical changes in definition and diagnosis! (5)

In 1955, the Salk injectable “formaldehyde killed” polio vaccine (IPV) was tested on 1.8 million children. Within days, cases of paralysis in the vaccinated started occurring. This is known as the “Cutter Incident.” The vaccine, distributed by the Cutter Laboratories, apparently still contained live polioviruses. (6) It seems that the problems with the Salk vaccine prompted the development of Sabin’s oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV), which was given starting in 1963. Unfortunately, the OPV is responsible for many disasters as well as it is made from a live attenuated polio virus and can cause vaccine strain polio.

For instance, the country of Oman experienced a widespread outbreak of polio in 1988-1989, even though the vaccination rate had risen from 67% to 87%. (7) More recently, India has experienced a tremendous rise (47,500 cases in 2011) of non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP), despite costly vaccination efforts to eradicate polio. (8) It has also been estimated that up to 180 children in India develop vaccine-associated polio paralysis (VAPP) each year. Furthermore, vaccine-derived poliovirus (VDPV) has also been reported, though not as common (7 in 2011). (9) Since 1979, the only cases of polio in the US have been associated with the OPV. When the CDC finally admitted this, it sparked public outrage. In 2000, the CDC recommended reverting back to the “killed-virus” vaccine, which is still given today in the U.S. (10)

The Western Hemisphere was certified by the WHO as polio free in 1994 and no cases of (wild) polio have been reported in the region since 1991. (Surgeon General David Satcher, MD (MMWR 1994, 43-720-2, JAMA, Jan20, 1999, Vol 281, No 3) However, numerous cases of paralysis still remain. Suzanne Humphries, MD poses the question, “Does the public have any idea that there are hundreds of cases of something that would once have been called polio, and some of those children will be dependent on a modern version of the iron lung?” (11) Dr. Douglas Kerr from Johns Hopkins, stated in the Forward to Donna Jackson Nakazawa’s book “The Autoimmune Epidemic”, “Infants as young as five months old can get Transverse Myelitis, and some are left permanently paralyzed and dependent upon a ventilator to breathe…my colleagues at the Johns Hopkins hospital and I hear about or treat hundreds of new cases every year.”

Remember, before 1954, polio data included ALL paralysis. After the vaccine was introduced, other diseases were more often reported, such as meningitis. In July, 1955, 273 cases of polio were reported in Los Angeles County. In the same year, only 50 cases of meningitis were reported. Now pay attention! In 1966, 5 cases of Polio were reported and 256 cases of meningitis reported. Interesting, no? (12)

All of this was astounding to me and caused me to question if “Polio” still exists today. (e.g.) Guillain-Barre Syndrome, acute Flaccid paralysis (AFP), Chinese Paralytic syndrome, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, epidemic cholera, cholera morbus, spinal meningitis, spinal apoplexy, inhibitory palsy, intermittent fever, famine fever, worm fever, bilious remittent fever, ergotism, post-polio syndrome

Perhaps this is all still hard for most of you to believe. It took me time to wrap my mind around all this information. When you are told something over and over again by those whom you ascribe to be trustworthy, you start to believe it and so on it goes. Certainly I don’t expect you to believe me, but I encourage you to demand truth and seek it yourself.

I’ll end with this quote by Dresdan James.
“A truth’s initial commotion is directly proportional to how deeply the lie was believed…when a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker a raving lunatic.”

Prisms and Black Holes


Don’t you get so irritated by those crazy, idiotic, misinformed mothers who just believe anything they read on the internet and even dare question their children’s all-knowing pediatricians? I mean, who in their right mind would endorse aborted fetuses in their injectables, hepatitis B fecal milk shakes (mmm, yum), or give starving children what they really need – more vaccines? Oh, those nervous Nellies, haven’t they seen the study in the Journal of Pediatrics debunking the whole myth that vaccines cause autism? Now put it to rest already, Jenny McCarthy!

Did you actually read this study? I’m not going to spell it all out here and bore you with the details of this grossly biased and neglectful misuse of your tax dollars. Simply put, the study was performed in a way to intentionally deceive in order to produce the results they desired. Read it yourself. Why is it that the CDC has yet to conduct a study comparing the vaccinated with the unvaccinated? Perhaps fear of finding healthier kids, less chronic illness and autoimmune diseases or virtually no autism? However, the excuse given is that it would be unethical to perform this type of study.

Really? Unethical?

So it’s not unethical to use human fetal diploid cells (derived from aborted fetuses) to develop vaccines? Yeah, you heard me right. Two cell strains (WI-38 and MRC-5), made from two separate aborted fetuses, have been used for the production of hundreds of millions of vaccines. Read about it here. These fetuses were intentionally aborted too. But wait, wait, wait, don’t get your panties in a bunch. This happened decades ago! Surely, it is not part of vaccine development today. Fruit of the poisonous tree, my friends. But, go ahead, check your vaccine inserts to be safe. Sure enough, you’ll find the WI-38 and MRC-5 cells listed in quite a few of them.

It’s also not unethical to experiment on disabled children by injecting them with live hepatitis virus. What? You mean you wouldn’t feed a child a milkshake contaminated with hepatitis? Well, come on, they were mentally disabled and institutionalized in pretty deplorable conditions, so…it’s ok…riiight? Sounds absolutely vile, doesn’t it? Almost unethical really. Well, Saul Krugman, medical researcher who discovered a vaccine against hepatitis B and later became president of the American Pediatric Society, conducted these studies on the mentally disabled children of Willowbrook State School in Staten Island, New York. You think I’m joking about the milkshakes? Nope, I can’t make this stuff up. Newly admitted children were fed milkshakes, contaminated with feces, taken from already institutionalized children with hepatitis. Let me put your mind at ease though. These children were used for “the greater good.” Thanks to Mr. Krugman and these willing participants, we have a vaccine which we now give to our 12 hour old newborns, freeing them to be promiscuous and drug addicts.

Are you familiar with The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and their heroic global vaccination campaign? Why yes, it has been reported that polio is seemingly disappearing in India because of Bill Gates honorable efforts! Hurrah! Oh, but wait, silly me, this report is mainstream, so obviously they would leave out the most important part…the TRUTH! What this article fails to mention is that while wild polio is seemingly disappearing in India, there has been a huge increase of non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP). According to Dr. Neetu Vashisht and Dr. Jacob Puliyel of the Department of Paediatrics at St Stephens Hospital in Delhi, “There were 47,500 cases of non-polio paralysis reported in 2011, the same year India was declared “polio-free.” Huh. How about that? You see, these third world countries are being given the OPV (oral polio vaccine). Here in the U.S., OPVs were phased out in 2000 because of the many disasters associated with them and replaced with the injectable “formaldehyde killed” polio vaccine. So, what do we do with all the OPVs now? Well, give them to third world countries of course! No, not food, or water, or indoor plumbing. That would be far too logical.

Perhaps you’ve heard of the bizarre notion that somehow vaccines and SIDS are related? Just another illogical myth, right? Show me the proof, you say? Well, Viera Scheibner, a retired principal research scientist with a doctorate in natural sciences, researched this very topic back in 1985. Through the use of a computerized breathing machine, the breathing patterns of babies were monitored. Alarms would sound when the baby was under stress from shallow breathing or temporary breaks in breathing. The results were astonishing! Babies were monitored before and after vaccinations. No alarm sounded before vaccination, but then a series of alarms would sound after vaccination. Please read in detail here. So, of course, when the pediatric and SIDS researchers were informed of this, they immediately warned parents of the possible connection and encouraged further research into it. NOT. That would be the ethical thing to do, however, instead the Crib Death Management Center pediatricians stopped sending parents to obtain the breathing monitor. I’m sure though, that it had nothing to do with not wanting them to know that vaccines were stressing children’s breathing. Once again, not unethical by any means!

Shall I keep going here? I’ve only shed light on a few areas. You see, when you start seeking truth, it leads you to the realization of how deep the black hole of deceit goes. But, don’t believe me. Do your own research. Information is at your fingertips. We are responsible for the choices we make for ourselves and our children. DEMAND TRUTH.